The Free Press, Mankato, MN

Editorials

October 4, 2013

Union off base on MnSCU plan

Why it matters: Turf battles and fiery rhetoric won't help faculty union adapt to inevitable change at MnSCU.

The recent response by MnSCU faculty union leaders to the plan for charting the future of the MnSCU system strikes us as unduly political, laced with turf battle undertones and not terribly becoming of people who represent critical thinking and analysis.

We’re sure there are members of the faculty union who could offer up more pointed and intellectual criticism of the plan, and we hope they weigh in with responses as the plan is presented to the MnSCU Board in November.

The Inter Faculty Organization told the Star Tribune it opposed the plan it described as a “Soviet-style management structure with centrally controlled decision making by bureaucrats who are far removed from the classroom.”

It’s hard to fathom how one could come up with even a lose interpretation of that assessment in reading the draft report.

The MnSCU report working group included 46 representatives of stakeholders from MnSCU’s robust constituencies, including the faculty union, but it’s clear the plan is shaking up a system that is bloated, inefficient and has been unable to adapt quickly to changing times and limited resources.

We can see why the draft report rattles those who rely on MnSCU for their livelihood, but it is no less relevant for that reason. MnSCU with its 54 campuses and 430,000 students was once considered economic development for small towns in outstate Minnesota. Its 2,800 programs were sometimes duplicated for geographical access and convenience. Unfortunately, it cannot and should not serve that purpose in the future.

It must be streamlined to not only reduce duplication and excessive capital costs, but be more nimble and adaptive to the employment marketplace.

That means programs at every MnSCU institution, including Minnesota State in Mankato and South Central College, must be examined for relevancy, efficiency and quality. The charting the future plan calls for reducing duplication of programs, merging programs to campuses or other locations where expertise is highest and collaborating with outside institutions, private and public.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Editorials
Featured Ads
AP Video