The Free Press, Mankato, MN

Editorials

June 30, 2013

Court ruled justly on Voting Act

Why it matters: The Voting Rights Act will be more effective if it is updated

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled last week that a section — again, a section — of the 1965 Voting Rights Act was unconstitutional. That section required just nine states and parts of seven others to get preclearance from the federal government before changing their voting laws.

What still remains law is the Voting Rights Act itself which prohibits discriminatory voting practices. Both private parties and the Justice Department can challenge any practices in court.

Without question the United States has had a difficult history with racial discrimination taking it nearly 100 years from the Emancipation Proclamation to the Voting Rights Act to right a long-standing wrong.

But the section of the law — Section 4 — that was struck down, the court ruled, can no longer be justified constitutionally. This section was based on factual findings that were woefully out of date using statistics from 1972 and earlier years to determine which states or jurisdictions were discriminating and requiring such pre-clearance. As if those southern states and jurisdictions are the only ones in the country that could be discriminatory.

Even though, as pointed out by the chief justice in oral argument, the state with the largest gap between white and black voter turnout is Massachusetts.

As was pointed out in the ruling, Congress has the power to replace Section 4 and bring the preclearance data up to date rather than continue to single out specific states and jurisdiction mostly in the South. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor has reportedly expressed interest in rewriting this section which we doubt will be undertaken because some areas will have to face an unpleasant truth — racism can still exist everywhere. And it was easier to continue to punish the South rather than accept responsibility for you own actions.

The civil rights community is roiling from the ruling claiming the Voting Rights Act has been gutted. We expect there to be pressure on Congress and rightfully so. As pointed out by Abigail Thernstrom, vice-chairwoman of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Congress could restore federal powers to review ALL proposed changes in election procedures with the burden of proving an absence of discrimination in that district. It could use that data from the 2012 elections.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Editorials
Featured Ads
AP Video