In response to William Shores’ letter in the Dec. 7 edition, I agree that the firearms ad could have been on another page. I also agree with him that the United States has a problem of people killing people, but he did not indicate in his total number of firearm-related deaths, the number of lives lost due to suicide, accidents or justifiable homicides.
Unfortunately, many readers of Shore’s letter will misinterpret his figures without an explanation of circumstances surrounding firearm deaths.
The FBI report for 2010, as found at their website (http://www.fbi.gov/), lists the following “Expanded Homicide Data” for that year which appears to be the latest available. Note, the total number is for all murders by all means and does not include suicides by firearms which was reported by the CDC at their website (http://www.cdc.gov/) to be just over 50 percent all firearms-related deaths.
The above documented facts are not intended to cultivate an agenda but are to add insight to the numbers quoted by Shores. Hopefully, this information will help us all realize we have a very complicated social issue of people killing people, which continues to exist in the shadow of blaming inanimate firearms.
Taxpayers risk pollution costs
The major problem with copper mines is the environmental impact on the ground and surface water over many years. The Berkeley Pit in Butte, Mont., is one example of how extensive a management plan must be, to avoid poisoning the water in the region.
The Berkeley Pit is 1,700 feet deep and nearly 3 miles around and filling more every year.
It is essentially a sulfuric acid lake and is top on the EPA Superfund list. Our agencies must demand a management plan that protects our water and the larger environment right from the opening of the mine. And we, as taxpayers, must also accept the fact that we will have to fund part of the treatment and cleanup of mining pollution. Are the jobs and economic development worth that to us?