subscribesubscriber servicescontact usabout ussite mapBuy a Classified
Tue, Nov 10 2009 

Resources

print this story   Print this story
  Post to del.icio.us

Published December 16, 2007 11:49 pm - A new pollution regulation could be costly to some Minnesota cities, and officials in North Mankato and possibly Mankato, could join a coalition to bring a lawsuit against the MPCA.

Cities ponder lawsuit over pollution law
Officials say new regulation could wrongly penalize some cities

By Dan Linehan
Free Press Staff Writer

Free Press Staff Writer

Mankato and North Mankato are considering a contribution toward a lawsuit against the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to fight a new phosphorus regulation that won’t affect them but is one they argue will set a bad precedent.

It would impose a flat rule of phosphorus discharge from water treatment plants — of 1 milligram of phosphorus per liter of water. That may not seem like a lot, but the most polluted lake in the state has about .09 milligrams of phosphorus per liter.

Both cities share a treatment facility that is more than able to meet the new standard, slated to go into effect May 1.

“Phosphorus is not an immediate concern for Mankato/North Mankato,” North Mankato City Administrator Wendell Sande said. “The precedent set by this kind of standard is.”

He said the city is considering a donation of up to $3,000 toward the lawsuit from the sanitary sewer fund, supported by residents’ utility bills.

That amount will be lower if Mankato goes in as well, a decision it expects to make next month.

The Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities, a lobbying and advocacy group, is considering the lawsuit because of the high cost cities bear in improving wastewater treatment, said Joe Sullivan, an attorney for the coalition.

And the standard, he said, is an across-the-board, unscientific measure that will levy unnecessary costs on cities not in danger of polluting a vulnerable watershed.

“Our issue is the rather arbitrary process of rule-making, that they don’t seem to follow the science of the rule-making,” Sullivan said.

As it stands, cities are only limited in their phosphorus pollution if the chemical will affect a downstream body of water, typically a lake, that has been declared “impaired” by the state, said Dennis Wasley, an MPCA scientist who sets phosphorus limits.

Mankato is included because the Minnesota River empties into the Lake Pepin watershed, which has been declared impaired.

But Mankato’s water treatment plant operates below its current mandate, and actually sells the right to pollute — called phosphorus “credits” — to an ethanol plant run by Granite Falls Energy.

This new standard wouldn’t affect those credits.



print this story    email this story   
Click here to load this Caspio Bridge DataPage.
Click here to load this Caspio Bridge DataPage.






autoconx

Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Premier Guide

 

Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc.CNHI Classified Advertising NetworkCNHI News Service
Associated Press content © 2009. All rights reserved. AP content may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Our site is powered by Zope and our Internet Yellow Pages site is powered by PremierGuide.
Some parts of our site may require you to download the Flash Player Plugin.
View our Privacy Policy
Advertiser index